Live Video Assessment
AI Buyer — Sarah ChenVP Operations
Candidate — Jordan RiveraAE Candidate
“We're evaluating three vendors. Why should we switch now?”
Response latency: 1.2s
Talk ratio: 42/58
Duration: 04:32
Probe events: 2/4
Overall82
Video assessment
Face-to-face with the AI version of your customer
Candidates join a live video call with an AI buyer avatar and are scored on real sales behavior — not interview performance.
Why teams use video
This is the closest thing to seeing the candidate in the deal
What video surfaces
Executive presence
Can they stay composed, credible, and concise when the buyer pushes back on camera?
Visual communication
Do they explain clearly, hold the thread, and sound like someone a customer would trust in the room?
Real conversation dynamics
The AI buyer reacts in real time, so the candidate has to think, adapt, and recover live.
Evaluator lens
Eye-contact consistency: strong
Response clarity: high
Buyer interruption handling: clean
Next-step confidence: credible
Executive presence shows up in how they hold the room after pushback.
This is why final-round and enterprise roles benefit most from video mode.
Presentation signalPremium
How it works
Design the buyer, run the call, review the evidence
Session design
Buyer avatar
Choose role, seniority, tone, and objection style to mirror the real account.
Deal context
Discovery, demo, negotiation, or renewal pressure — tuned to the stage you want to test.
Evaluation focus
Weight executive presence, discovery, objection handling, and close-worthiness for the role.
Live roleplay room
AI BuyerOps leader under pressure
CandidateHandling pricing pushback
“Your product sounds promising, but the committee will say it's too expensive for the rollout we want.”
“If price becomes the headline internally, what outcome are they not yet convinced they'll actually get?”
Presence under pushback: strong
Question timing: clean
Reframe quality: high
Committee-readiness: strong
What gets configured
Avatar, scenario, objection intensity, and dimension weighting so every finalist faces the same test.
What gets reviewed
Recording, transcript, integrity signal, score breakdown, and a recommendation managers can compare side by side.
Why this is different
Not another one-way video tool
What the evaluator sees after one call
Conversation evidence
The buyer pushes back, the candidate responds live, and every important moment is preserved in transcript and recording.
Score context
Presence, clarity, discovery, objection handling, and next-step control are scored together instead of judged by vibe.
Hiring value
You get a standardized live interaction that is easier to compare than ad hoc interviews and far more realistic than one-way recordings.
| Capability | Miki Video | One-way video | Live interview |
|---|---|---|---|
| Real-time conversation | ✅ Two-way dynamic | ✗ Pre-recorded prompts | ✅ but unstructured |
| Standardized scenarios | ✅ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Objective scoring | ✅ 10 dimensions | Partial | ✗ |
| Scheduling overhead | Low | Low | High |
| Integrity verification | ✅ patent pending | ✗ | ✗ |
Where it fits best
Use video where the hire stakes are highest
Enterprise AE hiring
Use video when executive presence, multi-stakeholder confidence, and camera communication matter to the deal cycle.
Final-round differentiation
Separate close candidates by seeing how they handle a live buyer rather than another polished interview answer.
High-cost hires
Add the premium assessment mode where one wrong hire creates six-figure drag on pipeline and ramp time.